top of page

Decoding the Cursive: How Handwriting Builds Suspense

  • Writer: E. A. Fournier
    E. A. Fournier
  • Jun 4
  • 5 min read

A Peek Inside Her Lost Diary


INTRODUCTION:


There is something about ink on paper that a screen can never replicate. A typed message is clean, controlled, anonymous and... passive. But a handwritten page? It bleeds. It trembles. It crosses things out, writes in the margins, draws arrows, and scribbles pictures beside the text.


Studies have been done with wired-up writers to compare their brains while using keyboards and screens vs. the same writers using pen and paper. Recent electrical studies, such as high-density EEG research at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, revealed that writing by hand produces significantly more widespread brain connectivity than typing, which is crucial for deep memory formation, high-level information encoding, and learning.


I write my first drafts by hand using cursive on lined paper. I feel more in touch with my ideas while I’m using a pen on paper. Some words get scratched out, some are immediately replaced; others migrate to new locations via long-tailed arrows. Intense X-ing-out and scribbling occur, and the old ideas remain beneath the ink beside the new ones. After the day’s battle, I rewrite a clean version while my mind can still track the struggle. In the morning, I type the fresh, handwritten pages into the computer. From then on, they live in the digital world.   

   

In Her Lost Diary, the physical journal at the heart of the story is more than a plot device. It is a layered puzzle—frayed leather edges, a brass receiver with a three-digit combination lock, and a belt clasp that snaps shut with the finality of a safe. Before a single word is decoded from cursive, it clearly communicates its warning: the owner of this book does not want it read.


I have long bemoaned the loss of cursive in schools. I believe it's a profound mistake on many levels. With this book, I gleefully took the opportunity to present a dilemma for Chayce, my main character. He desperately wants to read the diary but is hampered by his cursive illiteracy. The story turns on the physical and emotional texture of the handwriting—the loops, the dots, scratch-outs, the words in caps—to pull readers into a mystery that grows uncomfortably private and achingly intimate. Perhaps the most unsettling parts are not what the diary says, but the creepy fact that you were not supposed to see any of it.


THE ANATOMY OF A SECRET:


When Chayce first pulls the diary from the seat pocket on his flight, the description is precise and deliberate. The worn leather cover. The short belt with its dangling clasp. The brass receiver with its combination lock, small and stubborn as a closed fist. These are not decorative details—they are the architecture of privacy, and the prose makes you feel the weight of crossing that line.


The found object carries its own moral charge. The moment Chayce opens the diary at random and sees words in tight cursive with sporadic printed words all in caps—"DAMN HIM," "WHAT A JERK," "I'M AN IDIOT"—the reader is implicated alongside him. We are peeking through the same window right beside him. His guilt is also ours. The all-caps outbursts scattered among the loops of cursive act like flares: sudden, bright, impossible to ignore. They are the moments when the diary writer stopped trying to compose herself and simply erupted onto the page. The shift from trivial college notes to frantic, fearful scribbles is an attempt to visually reveal a devastating change. You don’t need to be told that something went wrong in her life. The writing style itself tells you. The prose makes the reader feel like a detective and a trespasser at the same time—and that tension never fully resolves.


I have always pondered the paradox about diaries and journals. Yes, they’re private and should be allowed to remain private. Some people write down very personal thoughts, they recount embarrassing moments in great detail, others express devastating judgments about peers; but do they really believe their words will never see the light of day? Isn’t it a form of titillation to write what you hope no one will read? A kind of daring exposure that borders on exhibition? And if someone secretly reads your diary, would there be any way for that person to repair the breach? What could they possibly do to make up for such a violation?


READING BETWEEN THE SCRATCH-OUTS:


Here is a truth that Her Lost Diary understands: what a person tries to erase is often more revealing than what they leave on the page.


The diary entries where the writer's fear overtakes her penmanship are some of the most emotionally charged passages in the book—not because of what they say, but because of what they refuse to say cleanly. Words are scribbled over with multiple lines, as if just rejecting the thought beneath the ink were not enough. Replacement words are crammed between lines or shoved into margins. The physical act of revision becomes its own confession.


At work, I once had a serious disagreement with an internal client—at least it was serious to me. I composed a scathing email by hand and then typed it into an email. Before sending, I printed it out so I could revel in my wordsmithing. I showed it to a work-friend who taught leadership programs. He read it through, smiled, and congratulated me on how well I had laid out my frustrations. “Feel better?" I nodded. "Now," he advised, “if you’re smart, you’ll delete it instead of sending it.”  

  

What makes this technique so effective in Her Lost Diary is that it mirrors the way we actually process emotional overload. We don't think in clean sentences when we're frightened or furious. We circle back. We contradict ourselves. We scratch things out. The diary's physical messiness is not a flaw in the storytelling—it is the storytelling.


CONCLUSION:


The way a story is physically recorded can be just as thrilling as the story itself. Her Lost Diary makes that argument not in theory but in practice—page by page, scratch-out by scratch-out, one illegible word at a time.


There is a moment early in the book when Chayce closes the diary and the prose describes the moment as if a woman's voice had been cut off—a rough hand over her mouth, eyes unexpectedly wide. That image stays with you. It is the book's central tension in miniature: someone trying to speak, someone else trying to listen, and the gap between them filled with ink and fear and the stubborn hope of connection.


Do you still occasionally write by hand? Think about your own cross-outs, or the words you pressed hard enough to tear the page, the sentences you buried under ink because you couldn’t bear to leave them legible. What do they say about the moment you were in? Grab a copy of Her Lost Diary and see if you can piece together the clues before Chayce does. The cursive is waiting.

 

 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


​FOLLOW ME

    • Instagram

    © 2018 by E. A. Fournier. Created with Wix.com

    bottom of page